Talk:Cessna Citation V

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cessna Citation V. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cessna.com/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:50, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cessna Citation V. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120806054522/http://www.cessna.com/citation.html to http://www.cessna.com/citation.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:53, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Specifications

Hello @Nigel Ish:, you reverted my previous edit on specs stating offline references are allowed - stop forcing articles to use online sources only, perhaps because my edit summary was online refs for easier verification, but my edit summary was lacking the important expansion of specs. You are right, WP:offline references are perfectly acceptable, but it wasn't the main point of my edit. Are you OK if I restore the previous additions with this new ref? Thanks.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 12:07, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

You were also linking to what appears to be a copyvio. As such how can we be sure that the article is correctly presented and not been altered.Nigel Ish (talk) 12:38, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

A WP:copyvio would be to copy the text in wikipedia, not the case here. It is not altered.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 12:46, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Linking to copyvios is not acceptable - see Wikipedia:COPYLINK.Nigel Ish (talk) 12:50, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

OK, the link can be omitted as it would be another offline source.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 13:27, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Citation V vs Citation Excel

I don't think it's appropriate to categorize the Excel as a "variant" of the Citation V in the infobox considering that the Excel uses a different fuselage, engines, flight deck, and carry-through section. Any arguments? Carguychris (talk) 16:34, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

OT-47B - which variant is it?

A citation (no pun intended...) in the article body says that Jane's All the World's Aircraft 1996–97 indicates the OT-47B is a Model 560, but it doesn't say which version. The globalsecurity.org page cited in the article says that the OT-47B is a Model 552, but I'm inclined to ignore this claim; globalsecurity.org is considered unreliable per WP:RSP, and both Szurovy and Joe Baugher indicate that the Model 552 is the U.S. Navy T-47A, a short-wing version of the S/II acquired in 1984, substantially predating the Ultra. While it's not unprecedented for the military to order an aircraft that's out of production, I don't think it makes sense here, as Szurov says that the 552/T-47A was designed for low-altitude maneuverability to simulate air-to-air combat, which is not necessary for monitoring drug smugglers; for that, you want endurance and speed at high altitude, hence an Ultra or Encore makes more sense. Carguychris (talk) 20:16, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Good guess! Per Frawley, Gerard (2002). The International Directory of Military Aircraft, 2002–2003. Fyshwick, ACT, Australia: Aerospace Publications Pty Ltd. ISBN 1-875671-55-2., it's based on the Ultra. BilCat (talk) 21:34, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, I've updated the article. Do you have a page number? Also, does the book indicate that the "Tracker" name was used? Carguychris (talk) 23:12, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

P. 61, and no, it doesn't mention the name "Tracker". BilCat (talk) 23:38, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Found a source for the name: Cessna on track. BilCat (talk) 00:03, 4 November 2022 (UTC)