Talk:Cerro Romualdo

Volcanoes Low‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Relabeling as mountain

I propose that all referrals in the article to Cerro Romauldo as a "hill" be changed to "mountain". At 1,300 feet in elevation, Cerro Romauldo already satisfies the opinion of many people that eminences greater than 1,000 feet in elevation are mountains rather than hills. At least as importantly, Cerro Romauldo has considerable topographic prominence -- it rises about 1,000 feet above the immediately surrounding terrain; it is also detached from all other nearby peaks, and is steep from all approaches. In short, Cerro Romauldo looks like a mountain. Unless someone makes a compelling argument to the contrary, I'll change all references of "hill" to "mountain", to suit. Bricology (talk) 05:12, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Finally corrected the use of "hill" to "mountain", to refer to Cerro Romualdo. The article on "hills" states "Geographers historically regarded mountains as hills greater than 1,000 feet (304.8 meters) above sea level..." and at 1,300 feet, Cerro Romualdo certainly qualifies. Bricology (talk) 01:07, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Cerro Romauldo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090625183618/http://santalucia.sierraclub.org:80/ninesis.html to http://santalucia.sierraclub.org/ninesis.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:36, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Misspelled everywhere in article

The correct spelling of the name is "Cerro Romualdo", not "Cerro Romauldo". Most other sources spell it correctly, going back to the 1861 United States Supreme Court case, United States v. Wilson, 66 U.S. 267. The name "Romualdo" belonged to a Chumash man who received the land grant from Pio Pico in 1846; this grant was titled "La Huerta de Romualdo" (approximately "the garden of Romualdo"). [1]https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/66/267/ Bricology (talk) 00:56, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]