Talk:Centurion-class battleship

Centurion-class battleship has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Centurion-class battleship is part of the Predreadnought battleships of the Royal Navy series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 10, 2018	Good article nominee	Listed
August 23, 2020	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

Military history: Maritime / British / European / Operation Majestic Titan

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Operation Majestic Titan (Phase I)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Centurion-class battleship/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 04:16, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This article is in great shape. A few comments:

check Brit/US Eng - armored and armoured both in lead, draught but authorized
link armoured cruiser at first mention
- Linked in the lede
rounding difference for draught between body and infobox
- Good catch
not sure about this, but the calibre rendering/conversion isn't consistent, some in inches as primary, others in mm?
- That's what happens when you buy guns from the French.
the smaller secondary battery doesn't match between the body and infobox
- Good catch.
  - Still showing one as 37mm and the other as 47mm. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:54, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    - Ooops.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:39, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
" ~~that~~ advocated"
could you add a bit of information about the names? eg This was the Nth RN ship to be named Centurion, and/or Barfleur was named after...?
- I save that for the individual ship articles.
would China Station be sufficiently notable for an article?
- I'm not sure that the sourcing would be readily available to do that.
you could probably get away with moving the Citations to 20em to eliminate whitespace
- Good idea.
draught and knots are overlinked
- I almost always forget to do that for some strange reason.
with the diagram, it says first-class battleships?
- Your guess is as good as mine.
also with the diagram licensing, do we know when Barnes died?
- Updated the licensing.
other images look fine to me.

That's me done. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also, happy to look at the ships of class once the relevant points raised here are addressed there too. I noticed the secondary battery issue is common to all three, haven't checked any of the rest. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:20, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Some of them carried over, mostly the guns and draught rounding. All done, and thanks for the through review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:27, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This article is well-written, verifiable using reliable sources, covers the subject well, is neutral and stable, contains no plagiarism, and is illustrated by appropriately licensed images with appropriate captions. Passing. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:57, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Scrapping

The article body says the ships were decommissioned in 1909 and scrapped "the following year" but the infobox says they were in commission until 1913? 'Built' dates also seem wrong in infobox? Cavie78 (talk) 17:07, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good eyes. Fixed.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:39, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]