Jump to content

Talk:Central London Railway/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 10:48, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 10:48, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Initial comments

[edit]

I've had a quick read through and this article appears to be at or about GA level (or possibly higher). I will now do a detail review, which might take a day or so to complete. During that time I will mostly be highlighting "problems", if any - so this is a somewhat "negative" stage in the overall process. Pyrotec (talk) 17:00, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Overall summary

[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


A comprehensive and fascinating article.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    Well referenced.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    Well referenced. Its the first time I've seen the London Gazette used as a cite in wikipedia transport article, but it is entirely valid as a means of WP:Verifiability.
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    Well illustrated - the maps are particularly helpful.
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

This article is a possible WP:FAC and I have no hesitation in awarding GA-status. Congratulations on your acheivements in producing a fine article. Pyrotec (talk) 10:41, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]