Talk:Center on Wisconsin Strategy

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wisconsin Low‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Material

I wrote similar material for the COWS website. I will see about making it clear that it is OK to use this in public. Esundquist (talk) 19:54, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refer to WP:Donating copyrighted materials. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:10, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 June 2017

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Not moved. There is clear consensus against the proposed move. bd2412 T 03:08, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Center on Wisconsin Strategy → COWS – Per WP:ACRONYMTITLE Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 14:50, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose see Caloric reflex test per Harrison's Neurology in Clinical Medicine "The acronym “COWS” has been used to remind generations of medical students of the direction of nystagmus—“cold water opposite, warm water same”) In ictu oculi (talk) 16:24, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above as well as 'Cow' or 'Cows' now link to Cattle, which would be the primary for both words. COWS means nothing to most people, except as multiple cows, while 'Center on Wisconsin Strategy' is self-descriptive and understandable. Randy Kryn (talk) 19:55, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – WP:ACRONYMTITLE says: "In general, if readers somewhat familiar with the subject are likely to only recognise the name by its acronym, then the acronym should be used as a title." I doubt anyone would see "COWS" and immediately think of the Center on Wisconsin Strategy. V2Blast (talk) 09:15, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@V2Blast: Well, it is what Acronym Finder and Abbreviations.com find. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 10:50, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Center on Wisconsin Strategy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151222080415/http://www.rightwisconsin.com/perspectives/215583421.html to http://www.rightwisconsin.com/perspectives/215583421.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:19, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]