From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Page-specific consensus
- There is consensus to include the BBC's description of the CSP as "not very highly respected" in the article lead. (RfC, June 2016, July 2017)
- There is consensus to opt for a syntax similar to "version B" in the following RFC to avoid a "too disparaging" lead. (RfC, Dec 2016, Jan 2017)
- The "Controversy" section should include that the Center has been criticized for propagating conspiracy theories. (Feb 2017, Feb 2017)
- The Southern Poverty Law Center is a reliable source for factual information on Wikipedia. (June 2018, WP:SPLC)
