Talk:Cem (river)/GA2
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Amitchell125 (talk · contribs) 12:08, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
I happy to review this interesting article. I'll send comments section by section, and where there are minor copy editing issues I will do them myself—please revert them if you wish. It will take a few days to check the article through before I start producing comments.
Assessment
[edit]Summary
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Images and captions
|
---|
These are all copyright free.
|
Links
|
---|
More comments to follow. Amitchell125 (talk) 14:18, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
|
Further comments
[edit]- @Maleschreiber: This is a very interesting and detailed article, but as the article stands, it cannot be said to be well written, because the grammar is not correct. Unresolved, this will cause the article to fail, and if there is a lot of correcting to do, I cannot copy edit the article with you and review it at the same time. Perhaps the best way forward is to address any other issues, and flag the article to be copy edited by someone else. What do you think?
I would amend ...a polje... to ‘...a vast flat plain known as a polje…’, as the term will be unfamiliar to many readers.- References 1-10 have been checked with the text, no problems found. Amitchell125 (talk) 07:32, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- Polje is a geological term, but if you think that it needs to become simpler, it can be changed to karst field.
- I would do that. Amitchell125 (talk) 08:10, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- I'll do the copyediting. If you need the full quote of any source, ping me.--Maleschreiber (talk) 11:59, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- I've gone through every section for grammar issues. Also, [1] this isn't a grammar mistake. I used historical present instead of simple past.--Maleschreiber (talk) 20:26, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks, I appreciate the work you've done. 'The Greek geographer Ptolemy...' is not a grammatical mistake, you're quite right, it just explains who the person was. Amitchell125 (talk) 08:24, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Amitchell125: I will expand the lead after source verification is completed.--Maleschreiber (talk) 19:05, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks, I appreciate the work you've done. 'The Greek geographer Ptolemy...' is not a grammatical mistake, you're quite right, it just explains who the person was. Amitchell125 (talk) 08:24, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
- I've gone through every section for grammar issues. Also, [1] this isn't a grammar mistake. I used historical present instead of simple past.--Maleschreiber (talk) 20:26, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
The maximal discharge rate of the river has been observed in May at 416 m3/s, - should be 41.6 (Mrdak & Hadžiablahović, p. 19). Amitchell125 (talk) 08:10, 6 October 2020 (UTC)In Albania, 130 bird species in total have been identified in Cem and its tributaries. - I could see how Ref 20 (Centre for Protection and Research of Birds) or Ref 21 (Méndez & Donázar) verified this. Amitchell125 (talk) 08:28, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Ref 22 (balkanrivers.net) doesn't appear to mention 22 species. Amitchell125 (talk) 08:31, 6 October 2020 (UTC)The tumulus of Rakića Kuće... - does it matter that Ref 36 (Bugaj) says "...the tumulus at Kuća Rakića..."? Amitchell125 (talk) 08:56, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
@Maleschreiber: The source verification is now completed, and only the above comments need to be addressed. Amitchell125 (talk) 09:59, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- In Albania, 130 bird species in total have been identified in Cem and its tributaries. and the total number of species of fish are mentioned in Marojević (2014)p.11:
Fauna në këtë regjion është e pasur. Aty jetojnë 8 lloje amfibësh, 16 lloje zvarranikësh, 130 lloje zogjsh
(130 bird species) and p. 9Bazuar në të dhënat e Institutit Bioteknik, në lumin e Cemit gjenden 22 lloje peshqish të regjistruar të cilët janë të ndara në 8 familje
(22 species of fish). Whether we use of or at Rakića Kuće doesn't change its meaning, because a tumulus (basically, a large burial mound) has a fixed location, so it can't be found somewhere else other than in its place of origin.Great, I'll address these issues and expand the lead.Done--Maleschreiber (talk) 20:38, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
- In Albania, 130 bird species in total have been identified in Cem and its tributaries. and the total number of species of fish are mentioned in Marojević (2014)p.11:
Copy editing
[edit]@Maleschreiber: I've put suggestions for improving the English here. I'll add further comments in the near future. Regards, Amitchell125 (talk) 09:54, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
- You need to check all your values are converted (including those for rainfall, e.g. 361 mm). Abbreviations are needed. Amitchell125 (talk) 13:54, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
On hold
[edit]I'm placing the article on hold for a week until 16 October to give time for you to finish address the remaining issues. Please feel free to contact me if you have any queries. Regards, Amitchell125 (talk) 18:52, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for the meticulous review! I will address them in the next couple of days. Does the lead need another expansion?--Maleschreiber (talk) 23:51, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, it does, just to make sure the main text is properly summarised. Thanks, Amitchell125 (talk) 06:46, 9 October 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.27.201.195 (talk)
- I've expanded the lead and addressed c/e. I haven't used some of the c/e suggestions because c/e had already taken place by another editor and in some parts I made some changes which are a bit different.--Maleschreiber (talk) 23:03, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, it does, just to make sure the main text is properly summarised. Thanks, Amitchell125 (talk) 06:46, 9 October 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.27.201.195 (talk)
Passing
[edit]I have great pleasure in passing your article. I've added a map, which can be altered or improved in any way if you wish me to. Thanks for all your work! Amitchell125 (talk) 12:22, 10 October 2020 (UTC)