Talk:Celo Community
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | It is requested that a photograph of Celo community be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in North Carolina may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Shortly after this page appeared there was a tag to suggest that it be deleted, with the stated reason being it is an insignificant commune. I contest that characterization, and allow me to provide further background to its authorship. I am a prof. of political science at Macalester College (Minnesota), teaching a course on American Political Thought. As one of their assignments this term students were asked to author or improve a wikipedia page related to this course. I was involved in their topic selection, and indeed I rejected or discouraged students from a number of topics, in some cases because the amount of material already available on wikipedia seemed proportional to the topic's significance. In this case, written by a fine student, we sat down together with materials related to a key subject in the course (utopianism) and came to the conclusion that, on the basis of published scholarship, Arthur Morgan's pre-existing entry was too thin and the absence of any entry for Celo Community was a clear deficit. In the coming week I will be reviewing (grading) and editing the entries from the class and working with them to clean them up. On the larger question of the worthiness of this entry, I fail to comprehend how material that might be thought worthy of future discussion in the classroom, and which is the subject of discussion in scholarly literature (not all of which may have been cited in this entry), would be deleted. In the area of utopian thought and communal settlements in particular, it is the flowering of a wide diversity of settlements over a long stretch of American history that helps to make them worthy of study.
- Hi, If some reliable secondary sources(not from the community itself) can be added, I will be in favor of the article being kept. Please read Wikipedia:Reliable sources for the Wikipedia policy on sources. If you have any questions just ask.WackoJackO 07:20, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Waco, did you see the references? There is a book published by the University of Illinois Press in 2001. That is not from the community itself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arosselli (talk • contribs) 16:02, 8 April 2009 (UTC)