Talk:Cellophane paradox/Archives/2013
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Cellophane paradox. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Fixing the Article
I just fixed up part of the article so it would make more sense, but the article still isn't coherent content-wise. Could someone look over the whole thing? Woken Wanderer (talk) 02:10, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Maybe we should make a page discussing US v. du Pont (1956) and then add this as a section of subsequent criticism of the Court's reasoning. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.129.89.10 (talk) 20:45, 20 April 2013 (UTC)