Talk:Cedarburg, Wisconsin
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Rewrite
[edit]I was going to just fix up the organization of the article, but it turned into a fairly major rewrite. I added a section about the history, and fixed up the tourism and attractions part. I got rid of the airport listing. I can't imagine why that would be important. I got rid of some of the info about the attractions. Wikipedia is not a guidebook, so there's not need for addresses, hours or admission fees to places.
I also left out a lot of pictures. I don't feel they add much, to the article. Does anyone have an opinion about this?
-
1. Church
-
2. Building
-
3. Washington Ave
-
4. Washington Ave
-
5. Washington Ave
-
6. Washington Ave
-
7. Old Power Co
-
8. Mill
-
9. Washington Ave. Historic District sign
-
10. Mills On The Creek sign
-
11. Interurban Bridge
Which pictures, if any, do you think should be included? Number 6 is not very good at all. It's a picture of SUVs and an ugly decoration on a light post. 5 and 7 don't show much either. 3 and 4 show general street scenes, but the buildings recede rather quickly, so it's hard to see what the town looks like. The mill (#8) is already shown in another photo in the article. Should we put the gallery back in, and with which pictures? -Freekee (talk) 15:40, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- Answer to questions - put in Number 8
I
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Cedarburg, Wisconsin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080616083336/http://www.biztimes.com:80/news/2007/11/9/cedarburg-has-formula-for-model-downtown to http://www.biztimes.com/news/2007/11/9/cedarburg-has-formula-for-model-downtown
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070803070641/http://www.co.ozaukee.wi.us/history/CedarCreekSettlement.htm to http://www.co.ozaukee.wi.us/history/CedarCreekSettlement.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:33, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Cedarburg, Wisconsin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20121115232718/http://www.census.gov:80/geo/www/gazetteer/files/Gaz_places_national.txt to http://www.census.gov/geo/www/gazetteer/files/Gaz_places_national.txt
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:15, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Cedarburg, Wisconsin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6HQu4Spqa?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.census.gov%2Fpopest%2Fdata%2Fcities%2Ftotals%2F2012%2FSUB-EST2012.html to http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2012/SUB-EST2012.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov to http://factfinder2.census.gov
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071210005300/http://www.cedarburglightandwater.com:80/about_us/default.asp?CategoryNumber=2 to http://www.cedarburglightandwater.com/about_us/default.asp?CategoryNumber=2
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6YSasqtfX?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.census.gov%2Fprod%2Fwww%2Fdecennial.html to http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:20, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cedarburg, Wisconsin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150206032955/http://summersounds.net/index.php/home/ to http://summersounds.net/index.php/home
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:36, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Census info removed
[edit]Please see this. I cannot connect to the source, so please revert if needed. Thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Images
[edit]In case anyone is interested in images of Cedarburg, that might be useful in this article, they may be found here: [1] I think the image mix is pretty good right now, but at some point, we might want to add a gallery. -Freekee (talk) 03:31, 18 January 2020 (UTC)