Talk:Caveh Zahedi

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Deletion!?!??!?

Why the hell would Calton propose this article be deleted? Zahedi has 76,000 hits on Google. I don't understand. This article should be kept and protected from deletion. TruthCrusader 07:51, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notable?

Is this guy notable? He seems like just another struggling (and misguided!) film student. -- Mikeblas 21:49, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Six months ago I searched for Cavah Zahedi on Wikipedia and got a fascinating, quirky, Biography which complimented his movies brilliantly. Now there is this. And I see now what the WikiCritics are saying, this site is going to hell out of its own self-censorship and fetish for being 'respectable'. The notion that the public (the same public that this encyclopedia is by and for) is neatly reducible to an abstract meta-scheme is ludicrous. Pertinent and interesting information is thrown out by individuals, like above, lacking in the most basic understanding of the topics at hand. The Wikipedia community is single handedly shunning their greatest asset (The varied interests of its readers), in a misguided attempt to become 'yet another,' identical to its competitors. Goodbye Wikipedia, it was fun while it lasted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.82.34.140 (talk) 16:26, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Caveh Zahedi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:58, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]