Jump to content

Talk:Causes of income inequality in the United States

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Causes of income inequality in the United States's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "cbo.gov":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 22:23, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay AnomieBOT, you're doing your Best! Waffle Attack411 (talk) 13:16, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong chart

[edit]
U.S. real wages remain below their 1970's peak.[1]

This needs to be replaced with a chart of total compensation because according to the same source that produced this chart, most economist have long known that total compensation is the correct measure to use. The St. Louis Fed has various versions of total compensation charts.Phmoreno (talk) 02:44, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Causes of income inequality in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:12, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not rationally developed

[edit]

I recommend following classical economics and dividing income into returns to labor and returns to capital.

Returns to labor have an economic cause: how much value can a worker add. Similarly, returns to capital depend on how effectively it is employed.

Build the rest of the discussion from these fundamentals.Phmoreno (talk) 02:10, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Causes of income inequality in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:52, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Causes of income inequality in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:09, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Both articles are on fairly similar topics (the other article says it's about a term in the first paragraph but the rest of it is just about the phenomenon) so there isn't really much reason to have two separate articles here from what I can see. Maybe this can be moved to a better title (I see Wealth ineq. in US also links here, so maybe drop the income at least?) but one thing at a time? Alpha3031 (tc) 05:08, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support: Looks to me like Great Divergence is more of a book than common term. Per WP:NB "Great Divergence" barely meets the notability guideline for an article (it has multiple reviews). But then per WP:PAGEDECIDE I think the subject matter is better handled in a broader article. Earlsofsandwich (talk) 17:23, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Agree with Earlofsandwich, but a single merged article will be of more use to a reader than this current situation, and a non geographic restricted subject allows a more general look, as the issue is not limited only to the US. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 11:12, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose as the articles are about clearly distinct topics. This article concerns the United Sates, the second has global scope. This article is not bounded by time, the other focusses on the dramatic rise in inequality that started in the late 1970s, in contrast to the earlier Great Compression seen in the middle 3rd of the 20th century. So there's a scope clash. A merge would mean we'd no longer have an article that would allow coverage of periods of rising US inequality in the first decades of the 20th century & earlier. Also, either huge chunks of this article would have to be deleted, or the resulting merge would be heavilly over-weighted for the US rather than global coverage. Rising inequality is a global problem, and per strong strong evidence that inequality is harmful to the poor & even the rich, it would serve the reader better to follow the lead of WP:RS and treat noteable aspects of the Inequality problem in seperate dedicated articles. FeydHuxtable (talk) 14:24, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]