Talk:Catterick, North Yorkshire

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Catterick, North Yorkshire is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

York Museums Trust Low‑importance

	This article is related to the York Museums Trust and is relevant to the GLAM partnership between the trust and Wikimedia UK. Please copy assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one as needed.York Museums TrustWikipedia:GLAM/YMTTemplate:WikiProject York Museums TrustYork Museums Trust-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Reworking notes

I have removed the entry about David Simpson as the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography article about him does not explicitly substantiate that of the Sunday Schools he set up in his ministry, that one of them was in the village.Rimmer1993 (talk) 13:18, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cataractonium Page Creation?

I think we could justify the creation of a page for the Roman fort at Catterick as it was a considerable site and is really well published in the two catalogues as Wilson, P. 2002. Cataractonium: roman Catterick and Its hinterland York: Council for British Archaeology. I can't do it myself as I'm COI but would happily advise. Zakhx150 (talk) 14:09, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree as there are plenty of other Roman settlements with their own articles. Probobaly the article should be along the lines of Eboracum. Any suggestions for online sources to start the page? Rimmer1993 (talk) 16:25, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Catterick, North Yorkshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131203043132/http://www.ciht.org.uk/motorway/a1nrcccattbp.htm to http://www.ciht.org.uk/motorway/a1nrcccattbp.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:57, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]