Talk:Catherine Linstrum

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Women writers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Did a few fixes. Cannes-winning writer, seems to be notable enough. Lampman (talk) 09:31, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide a source for that award claim please? Movingboxes (talk) 09:47, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I realise WP isn't a reliable source, but it is listed Un Certain Regard. Ged UK (talk) 10:09, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting hairs here, more out of curiousness than a passion to see this article gone--as she was the writer for a Cannes-winning film, and not necessarily the winner herself (it looks like the director won) does that notability transfer to her? Movingboxes (talk) 10:15, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blimey! That's a question for the film wikiproject to get their heads around! My gut feeling is yes, it should. Would the director have won with a poor script? Unlikely (though concievable i suppose). And vice versa? Again, maybe, but I think the writer is too integral a part. Ged UK (talk) 10:46, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the thought-provoking discussion! I've removed the speedy tag. Whatever the final call on notability is, there is certainly an assertion of notability now. Movingboxes (talk) 10:55, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]