Talk:Catherine de' Medici's court festivals

Catherine de' Medici's court festivals has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 1, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 22, 2008.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that one of Catherine de' Medici's court festivals featured an artificial whale that spouted red wine when harpooned?

Dance: Ballet

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dance, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dance and Dance-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DanceWikipedia:WikiProject DanceTemplate:WikiProject DanceDance

This article is supported by WikiProject Ballet.

WikiProject Ballet To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See the Image requests page. Articles: Choo Chiat Goh, Vladimir Bourmeister, Columbia City Ballet, Michael Cook (ballet), Peter Schaufuss, Cyril Atanassoff, Post-structuralist ballet
Cleanup : Ballet Fantastique, NYCB/cast lists, re-write the whole Russian ballet article
Copyedit : Rasta Thomas, Ballet (marked as in need of immediate attention)
Disambiguation : Moscow Ballet
Expand : French ballet, Balanchine method, Cecchetti method, Original Ballet Russe, Royal Swedish Ballet, Bloch (dancewear), Turnout (ballet), Opera ballet, English ballet, Italian ballet
NPOV : Capezio
Stubs : Pas de deux, ballet tutu, Nicolai Legat, John Neumeier, Miami City Ballet, more
Unreferenced : Miami City Ballet, Oklahoma City Ballet
Wikify : Moscow Ballet (United States), Oklahoma City Ballet (in need of sections and references)
Other : Review recent changes to ballet articles.

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

DYK

Very nice! Will you put it up for DYK? Johnbod (talk) 13:46, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm planning to do it today. Very short of images. There are some little ones in Strong that I could scan, but unsatisfactorily. I have yet to find decent online images of the Valois tapestries (there is a coloured one in my Frieda book, but again, paperback size). Otherwise I may just have to stick in the usual Clouet portraits. Nothing that would work as a DYK image; may just have to go there imageless. Shame, since this is such a visual topic. qp10qp (talk) 14:05, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I had a poke round this database, which does have loads of books worthing linking to, but so far all ther pics are poxy "devices". Johnbod (talk) 14:34, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

WP:Good article usage is a survey of the language and style of Wikipedia editors in articles being reviewed for Good article nomination. It will help make the experience of writing Good Articles as non-threatening and satisfying as possible if all the participating editors would take a moment to answer a few questions for us, in this section please. The survey will end on April 30.

Would you like any additional feedback on the writing style in this article?

Just the normal review will be fine. qp10qp (talk) 14:12, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you write a lot outside of Wikipedia, what kind of writing do you do?

I don't, really. qp10qp (talk) 14:12, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is your writing style influenced by any particular WikiProject or other group on Wikipedia?

No. qp10qp (talk) 14:12, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

At any point during this review, let us know if we recommend any edits, including markup, punctuation and language, that you feel don't fit with your writing style. Thanks for your time. - Dan Dank55 (talk)(mistakes) 03:49, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. qp10qp (talk) 14:12, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA-Passed

Good job on the GA! Thoroughly sourced, contains lots of info. ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ ^{Drop me a line}§ 20:39, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for taking the trouble to review it! qp10qp (talk) 22:30, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Magnificence (history of ideas) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 04:19, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]