Talk:Caterpillar D7
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Caterpillar D7 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]I don't believe that the 1st 2 sentences of this article are appropriate to this encyclopedia, as they seem to be just advertising. The rest of the page is just copied out of an owner's manual. --Alphachimp talk 06:38, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
- Better now ? - Peripitus 13:15, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
That the D7 was CAT's 4 cylinder variant seems missing. There was some logic in the naming of the old dozers, just not quite as straightforward as could be.
Categories:
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class military land vehicles articles
- Military land vehicles task force articles
- Start-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- Start-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- Start-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- Start-Class WikiProject Illinois articles
- Low-importance WikiProject Illinois articles
- Start-Class Brands articles
- Unknown-importance Brands articles
- WikiProject Brands articles