Talk:Catauxi

	Indigenous peoples of the Americas portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the Americas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indigenous peoples of the Americas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of the AmericasWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasIndigenous peoples of the Americas
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Brazil: Geography Low‑importance

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Geography of Brazil task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Verification

I removed this from the article because the 1911 Britannica does not make an up to date source for this type of information: "Around their wrists and ankles they wear rings of twisted hair. They cultivate mandioc, and make pottery and bark canoes." Previously had been removed "They are a fine warlike race, with remarkably clear complexions and handsome features" and references to cannibalism. The only other thing I could find on the web was this, but it is in Portuguese and only mentions the Catauxi once. At best it could be used for more info on generalizations of the peoples in the area, but at least it verifies their existence. The source I did add was basically a circular reference which is subpar, but I felt it was better than nothing until better sources might be able to be found. - Taxman ^Talk 19:55, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]