Talk:Catastrophe bond

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History

Has a cat bond ever been triggered resulting in a total loss of principal? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.250.23.36 (talk) 15:23, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, following Katrina in 2005 (Kamp Re), the Tohoku earthquake in 2011, and a series of severe convective storms in the US in 2011 (Mariah Re 1 and Mariah Re 2). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.155.238.154 (talk) 10:28, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Patents

To the editors that keep deleting the patent section, could you elaborate on your concern? For the record, I have no commercial interest in the particular examples cited. I also moved the examples to the footnotes.--Nowa 18:56, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

From the edit summary [1], "No free advertising on Wikipedia. Check the policy.", the issue seems to be about alleged "advertising" (Neutral point of view?) in the "Patents" section. Nowa, I think you made a very generous change by moving the examples to footnotes. IMHO it was not necessary. Until Blue Fluff discovers the use of talk pages, his manner of contributing amounts to vandalism. Next time he'll remove anything from the article without discussing it, he will be blocked. See his talk page. So, Blue Fluff: please explain! --Edcolins 16:22, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Legally-Sticky Wiki?

Readers beware - in this and other entries, certain contributors continue to attempt to create a legal problem for you - and even your employer - by posting patent numbers. Under current United States law in particular, a posted patent number can create an expensive legal mess - an affirmative duty that arises for you or your organization not to infringe the patent. This duty usually requires you to hire a lawyer and obtain an expensive legal opinion. Now for the worst part - the granted U.S. patent referenced below does not even relate at all to catastrophe bonds. And, as to the published patent application, it is essentially meaningless. If you want to see how ridiculous published patent applications can be, read U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 20070035812 wherein the inventor claims "exclusive rights to the ethical use and financial gain in the use of godly powers on planet Earth." In short, this inventor claims his patent-pending godly powers have been infringed by the government.

God doesn't need patents and neither does Wikipedia - an Internet dictionary should not be used to drive a contributor's hidden agenda. To be forewarned is to be fore-armed as they say, and you are now forewarned. And if you, like us, believe content contributors shouldn't be driving their hidden legal agendas - especially about dubious patent filings - let them know that this has no place on Wikipedia. Make Wikipedia a patent-free zone - take these dubious entries down. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymous2003 (talk • contribs)

So You Want to Issue a Cat Bond [Overview of the cat bond Issuance Process]

In this article, members of AIR Worldwide—a catastrophe modeling firm in Boston—offer a primer on the catastrophe bond issuance process, including an overview of some of the most common structures and trigger types.

http://www.air-worldwide.com/_public/NewsData/001410/AIRCurrents_CatBond.pdf

Meagangwhite (talk) 16:59, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removed erroneous links

Have removed link to Atlas II as it is an article on the spacecraft and not the cat bond

Faragher (talk) 09:12, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Catastrophe bond. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:36, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]