A fact from Castner Range National Monument appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 April 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: The article is very nice and meets all DYK criteria, but I think the hook needs to be changed, because the cause of the protection of the site was not only the plan to turn it into a recreational area. Castner Range is also important for historical and naturalistic reasons, and in my opinion this should appear in the hook. Alex2006 (talk) 08:43, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've changed that to "used for recreation". It does also have historical and natural importance, but the remediation is less relevant to that purpose – it had already been preserved for those. Or what wording would you suggest? Reywas92Talk13:35, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, on second thought, you are right. The reasons for protection are different, but the main use will be recreational. Good to go!Alex2006 (talk) 19:45, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Reywas92 and Alessandro57: Just a suggestion for a hook. Shortened and geographically labeled. Once I added (pictured) to your hook it was 199 characters and it might be TMI.
I am one who thinks that once we get to parsing the hook, it ends up too literal and complete with no reason to read the article. I will go with Reywas92's suggestion because it still leaves me a reason to click the article. Bruxton (talk) 00:21, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]