Talk:Castle Hill, Huddersfield

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Castle Hill, Huddersfield article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Fortifications / British / European / Medieval C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Mid‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Castle Hill, Huddersfield is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Not a copyvio, according to its first author

The first draft of the article, as added to Wikipedia this morning, stated that it was based on a work published in the 1990s. That would make it a copyvio unless the writer of the article and the writer of the book were one and the same. It finally turned out, according to the author — see their Talk page — that the initial basis of fact was indeed that printed work, but the writing is original to Gaj. Therefore, no copyvio. Bill 15:53, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have added lots of links. I have also asked the original author to add references to verify the information. --Bduke 07:51, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war re developers

It is not a question that facts should not be deleted. I presume the developers are "Asian" but it has never been sourced. Also is it important that they are "Asian"? I would have thought that the fact that they are local developers is the important point. Please stop reverting and discuss the issue here. --Bduke 07:46, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually there is no edit war. The Thandi brothers are known to the people of Huddersfield, purely for their involvement with the Pub. It is factual is that they are Asian, unfortunately you would be unable to have seen their photographs in the local media. However they are not developers in the sense of being property developers. They are simply the owners of a pub who attempted to use backdoor methods to demolish an extremely popular local landmark pub, first built in 1812, almost 200 years old, and rebuild it to a size and extent that was specifically prohibited in the building permission issued. The set of images at the bottom of the article shows the seriousness of the issue.

The fact the the Town Council had to take legal action against them for their activities is sourced here:- [:http://ichuddersfield.icnetwork.co.uk/0100news/0100localnews/tm_method=full%26objectid=17080743%26siteid=50060-name_page.html]

The activities leading up to the action is sourced here:- [:http://ichuddersfield.icnetwork.co.uk/0100news/0100localnews/tm_method=full%26objectid=15170728%26siteid=50060-name_page.html]

Their friendly nature is evidenced here:- [:http://ichuddersfield.icnetwork.co.uk/0100news/0100localnews/tm_method=full%26objectid=16153975%26siteid=50060-name_page.html]

Their unfriendly nature is sourced here:- [:http://ichuddersfield.icnetwork.co.uk/0100news/0100localnews/tm_method=full%26objectid=16153976%26siteid=50060-name_page.html] 82.30.76.239 08:37, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have no doubt that this is an important issue, but why is it important to state that they are "Asian". In one sense they are as Yorkshire as I am, even though I live in Australia, or presumably you are. It is what they did that is important not that they look Asian. The edit war is that "Asian" keeps getting added and then deleted. There really is not need for it. I'm sure most people recognise Thandi as an Asian name. Let it go. Concentrate on the issue. --Bduke 10:29, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is no reason to use the word Asian here to denote the brothers, unless it is to say that part of the route of the problem in the community was resistence to perceived outsiders?? This comment was by User:80.192.148.26.

I agree, and that argument is not made. I have therefore removed the word "Asian". I hope you will both accept my mediation in this matter. --Bduke 00:59, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Castle Hill, Huddersfield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:14, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Castle Hill, Huddersfield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110609181801/http://www.kirklees.gov.uk/events/documents/castle-hill-plans.pdf to http://www.kirklees.gov.uk/events/documents/castle-hill-plans.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:05, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]