Jump to content

Talk:Caslon Type Foundry

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk09:35, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Slab-serif type sold by the Caslon foundry in 1841
Slab-serif type sold by the Caslon foundry in 1841

Created by Blythwood (talk). Self-nominated at 20:55, 29 December 2021 (UTC).[reply]


General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Interesting article and well sourced. New enough, long enough. I'd say good to go. Copyvio unlikely Paradise Chronicle (talk) 23:34, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Blythwood: hi there! couple questions about the sourcing:
    • The type did not become popular.[o] does the ref in the o cite the back half of that passage?
    • Where are the example pages cited to?
    • Ditto for the quote that begins Feeling, naturally, regret that the honoured and historical name of "Caslon" should die out...
  • Sorry about that, we'll get this promoted in a jiffy once this is cleared up. Thanks! theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (they/she) 23:25, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promoting to Prep 1, without the image (as there is much competition for the image slot. By my count, out of the 107 verified nominations, around 40 have images. Only 1 of 8 nominations can have image. So, only around 13-14 would be given the image slot) – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 09:35, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]