Talk:Cash flow
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cash flow article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Mch 09 Re-Write
[edit]I blanked out all the old comments because they were questions, or comments on stuff no longer there, and stale dated. No offense intended. Just thought it better to start again with a new slate of comments.24.82.171.161 (talk) 17:51, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Positive and negative
[edit]I'd like to see more about the cash flow sign convention here. When and where (and why) do people put a minus sign or a plus sign on certain cash flows? --Uncle Ed (talk) 17:32, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Society and social sciences
- Start-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
- Start-Class Economics articles
- Low-importance Economics articles
- WikiProject Economics articles
- Start-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Mid-importance WikiProject Business articles
- Start-Class Accounting articles
- Accounting articles
- WikiProject Business articles