Talk:Casey Jones (band)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]This article was deleted once- deletion was proposed because the article presented no indication that this band meets WP:MUSIC guidelines for inclusion. I had replaced the article with the deleted page template, but a did a bit of poking. AMG did review their first record here. I don't have much opinion yet on whether they meet the guideline but the appear to be in the right ballpark, so I undid the "deletedpage" template. There's some writing here that probably needs fixed, but it at least looks like having an article on this band is not unreasonable. Friday (talk) 19:44, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
I agree, they have 2 great albums now and this article should not be questioned, but it could be edited a little, I'm trying to dig up a little more information about them. Avenged Evanfold 02:38, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Casey Jones (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060721163915/http://www.eulogyrecordings.com:80/artists.php?band=1010 to http://www.eulogyrecordings.com/artists.php?band=1010
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:23, 16 November 2016 (UTC)