Talk:Case Study Houses

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Architecture

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

External links

User:DTravers claims that the article's external links to housing.com point to a site that has engaged in violation of copyrights held by him as former editor of Art & Architecture. This seems believable. Editors of this article should be mindful of Wikipedia's policy. (Wikipedia:Copyrights#Linking_to_copyrighted_works). --Dystopos (talk) 23:36, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Housing.com has taken down its Case Study House presentations,which were in violation of copyright. New links now take the visitor to the copyrighted Arts & Architecture magazine website presentations of the houses.Dtravers (talk) 00:27, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help in getting this sorted out. --Dystopos (talk) 03:36, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I went to the ModSims2 link that is on the CSH site and fail to see a relationship to the program. The "accessories" listed are decades after the program and wouldn't have been considered for inclusion if available.Dtravers (talk) 19:37, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Table

I'm neither a lover of, nor a master of, wikitables. In this case, though, it seemed like a way to make it easier to see what was going on. I'm sure a lot of functional and aesthetic improvements could be made by someone more skilled than myself. --Dystopos (talk) 01:05, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New Case Study Houses

the japanese architect Shigeru Ban calls his experimental habitats also Case Study Houses. there must be about 15 houses. interesting enough for mentioning it?? greets. --Mimar20zero9 (talk) 01:15, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unbuilt design

Are there no articles or books anywhere that give reasons why the unbuilt designs were not used? (e.g., Were any thought to be structurally unsound? impractical? Were any of the houses unable to be built because the designers were too busy, no land available, no interest by potential buyers?) Lawikitejana (talk) 11:55, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Internal Link - Bailey House

The link on Case Study House 20A (http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Bailey_House_%E2%80%93_Case_Study_House) directs to Case Study House 21B. According to Arts & Architecture, 20A is The Bailey House. According to the Los Angeles Historic-Cultural Monument listing, 21B is the Bailey House. Seeking more information. Vikingprin (talk) 03:11, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Case Study #20B - Bass House

The article states this house as "Demolished" but this house is actually still intact.

Google Maps - 2275 Santa Rosa Avenue — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.129.45.10 (talk) 23:53, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

House numbers are very confusing

Not sure how the Case Study numbers got so confused. I see two No. 1 houses, two No. 16's (not adjacent to each other on the chart, which is doubly confusing), two No. 17's, two No. 18's, a 19a but no No. 19, two 20's, two 21's, and one that has its construction date listed in the column where the Case Study number belongs (could it be the missing No. 14?). Does this confusion date to the '40s when the houses were commissioned, or is this mess original to Wikipedia? If the former, it would helpful to provide some explanation, if known. If not, then some acknowledgement that the confusion is longstanding might be in order. ~~Joey Harrison — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joeyharrison (talk • contribs) 14:41, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Case Study Houses. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:38, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Case Study Houses. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090107173044/http://virtualglobetrotting.com/map/55044/ to http://virtualglobetrotting.com/map/55044/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:42, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]