Jump to content

Talk:Cascade–Siskiyou National Monument

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

National Register?

[edit]

The article claims the monument is on the National Register. I searched the NR databases, but did not find any record. (Keep in mind only NPS historic Nat'l Monuments are automatically on the register, BLM NMs are not administratively listed.) — Eoghanacht talk 14:08, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see that twice in the last few weeks User:Dmadeo has replaced the {{Infobox protected area}} template on this article with {{Infobox NRHP}}. Both User:Eoghanacht (above) and I (in an edit summary) have advanced arguments why the NRHP infobox is incorrect for this article. I'd like to know the reason for Dmadeo's insistence on treating Cascade–Siskiyou National Monument as an NRHP site, because I see no sourced suppport for this idea at all. — Ipoellet (talk) 09:16, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi, first, sorry, I would not have knowingly done this twice without taking it to the talk page. As part of bringing List of National Monuments of the United States to FLC, I had been making a lot of runs through all the national monuments, especially those near the beginning of the alphabet :) My understanding was that all National Monuments were on the NRHP as well, but I dont have any specific evidence of that belief. Since I do a lot of work with the List of National Natural Landmarkss as well, which are also not listed on the NRHP, I should see about getting the default of NRHP out of that template. Thanks for pointing this out and sorry for causing you any trouble. dm (talk) 14:59, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No problem - thanks for being good-natured about it. As long as you don't have an objection, I'll switch the infobox back to {{Infobox protected area}}. Thanks for helping clarify things! — Ipoellet (talk) 04:22, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

IUCN status

[edit]

According to data available at National Gap Analysis Program the monument is not assigned a IUCN category. The data includes a statement that the monument is assigned "Gap Status: 3 - managed for multiple uses – subject to extractive (e.g. mining or logging) or OHV use." The Protected Planet webpage indicates that it is a IUCN category III area, but that I don't think it should be considered a reliable source since it is social media service according to [1]. –droll [chat] 21:01, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cascade–Siskiyou National Monument. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:05, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cascade–Siskiyou National Monument. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:25, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cascade–Siskiyou_National_Monument&oldid=1200784021"