Talk:Cartan–Karlhede algorithm

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the relativity task force.

Nice article, but I have a few criticisms:

The Lorentzian case is easier than the Riemannian case, in the sense that there ought to be fewer functionally independent quantities in the curvature and its derivatives. (See below.)
It should be mentioned that the isotropy groups in question are in fact the isotropy groups of the tetrad components of the curvature and its covariant derivatives.
It's unclear to me how the non-compactness of the Lorentz group makes the curvature normalization more difficult. The distinguishing feature of the Lorentz case is the Petrov classification, which always singles out certain classes of normalizations for the curvature. If anything, this is a big bonus over the Riemannian case.
The Karlhede (et al) work on Lorentzian spaces uses Cartan's method as the starting point, and then uses the Petrov scheme to simplify matters even further by giving sharper upper bounds on the required number of derivatives. This article suggests that what Karlhede did was somehow different from Cartan's work on Riemannian spaces from the outset. It wasn't. Karlhede's contribution seems to me to be an effective implementation of Cartan's otherwise unwieldy machinery.

Then again, mathematical physicists drink a different flavor of koolaid than I do, so take these criticisms with a grain of salt. Cheers, Silly rabbit 19:17, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Silly, the next section describes something which has been a long time coming and which has nothing to do with you! Sounds like you can improve the article without help from me, fortunately. Best ---CH 22:09, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean here by Riemannian. Riemannian in mathematics refers to a positive-definite structure in the tangent spaces, which is not the physical case. In GR you need to use an indefinite structure instead, so the appropriate notion is pseudo-Riemannian- or Lorentzian- or (the best notion) Minkowski-structure. Mathematically there is a huge gap between these structures. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.133.134.62 (talk) 18:25, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice to cruft controllers

I am leaving WP so I am now abandoning this article to its fate. ---CH 22:10, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cartan–Karlhede algorithm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051023160408/http://130.15.26.66:80/servlet/GRDB2.GRDBServlet to http://130.15.26.66/servlet/GRDB2.GRDBServlet

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:09, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Link isn't dead and the archive is useless since you can't query the database.2601:601:8601:1C89:B53A:3967:53A2:40A5 (talk) 20:20, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cartan–Karlhede algorithm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051023160408/http://130.15.26.66/servlet/GRDB2.GRDBServlet to http://130.15.26.66/servlet/GRDB2.GRDBServlet

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:03, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]