Talk:Carpal tunnel

Anatomy: Gross Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to gross anatomy.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Ejshanks.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:51, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

--68.235.167.26 (talk) 03:18, 5 November 2014 (UTC)--68.235.167.26 (talk) 03:18, 5 November 2014 (UTC)--68.235.167.26 (talk) 03:18, 5 November 2014 (UTC)==Merge== --68.235.167.26 (talk) 03:18, 5 November 2014 (UTC)I don't see any reason why you should care for any thing for the reason of a anandnenfjehufihrjgbrhgvyuherbghrhrbvgrhjej vhhnrnnc to merge this page with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Carpal tunnel is a part of the wrist, whereas the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome is a medical condition relating to that part of the wrist. Matthew 1130 00:34, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, if it should be merged anywhere, it should be merged into the wrist, and I think it should be merged there. WLU 03:15, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think that this can be merged with Wrist. If we do this, how about making Carpal tunnel redirect to Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, or should Carpal tunnel be a disambiguation page? What do you think? Figma 19:06, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think that a disambiguation page would be better, considering the confusion of terms between Carpal tunnel and Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. A disambiguation page might also identify other conditions which are frequently confused with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome:

- Ulnar neuropathy.
- Repetive strain injury.
- Radial nerve entrapment.لللكككققققققق
- Tenosynovitis, also known as first dorsal compartment tendonitis.

Matthew 1130 12:14, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My understanding is that disambiguation pages are only used to differentiate between things that have the same name (or at least very similar names). So, Carpal tunnel and Carpal Tunnel Syndrome could share such a page, but if we're looking to differentiate between different medical conditions with similar symptoms (and I'm not sure we should be), I think that would be best done on the Carpal tunnel syndrome page itself. Figma 13:38, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I oppose the suggested merge. The carpal tunnel may be best known for being involved in carpal tunnel syndrome, but that's not the only time it exists. This article can explain the structure of that area in more depth than might be appropriate in the CTS article. --Icarus ^(Hi!) 03:23, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for chiming in, Icarus! We were discussing merging Carpal tunnel into the Wrist article above? Do you oppose that idea? And, do you have an opinion on whether Carpal tunnel should redirect to CTS, or if, instead, it would be better if CT and CTS shared a disambiguation page? Cheers, Figma 06:18, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Figma and Icarus. Merging with CTS would be wrong, and merging with wrist does not eliminate the problem of wrongful reference to CTS. Disambiguation sounds unhealthy to me either. Carpal tunnel syndrome is just one specific condition, and carpal tunnel is an anatomical entity. Let there be a separate article which would explain all that is needed to be explained. --Maxxicum 05:09, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose a disease and a description of anatomy are two different things, they should each have their own page. It would be OK to copy some of the good info on the syndrome page over to the Carpal Tunnel page.

There seems to be a concensus against the merge - I removed the tags 22:15, 5 January 2007 (UTC) --68.235.167.26 (talk) 03:18, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Poorly labelled diagram

Image was changed. --Tom (LT) (talk) 21:04, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The diagram has poor labels, some are spelled incorrectly, some are antiquated terms capilote should be capitate hamete should be hamate lesser multiang should be trapezoid greater multang shout be trapezium flex dig sublimis shoud be flexor dig superficialis ext dig quinti prop should be ext digiti minimi ext dig communis should be ext digitorum ext dig quinti prop should be ext digiti minimi

Jon the id (talk) 23:04, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

To Do's

include diagram of carpal tunnel
include diagram of hand with muscles included/affected

Carpal Tunnel Contents

The contents of the carpal tunnel was corrected on February 6, 2006.

71.143.34.238 (Neona) 18:23, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]