This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Alternative medicine related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Alternative medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative medicineTemplate:WikiProject Alternative medicineAlternative medicine
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism
Not a long-term study. He practiced a meat diet as an experiment for 1 year in a non-controlled study funded by American Meat Institute. Laboratory observations were only made at selected intervals. At the end of the year, he was given glucose water and orange juice and went back to an ordinary mixed diet. If you read the earliest reports written by researchers who made the observations on Stefansson, they were very clear in their conclusion "The diet was expensive, caused some social inconveniences, and was not one to be recommended for universal use" [1]. Psychologist Guy (talk) 13:03, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Owsley Stanley ate a carnivorous diet for 50+ years. The term "fad diet" is a pejorative and should be removed in order to have a neutral point of view. Meistro1 (talk) 12:39, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You are correct that Owsley Stanley did follow a carnivore diet. However, you forgot to mention that he had a major heart attack in his late 60s (bizarrely he tried to blame his heart attack on a piece of broccoli he ate as a child); he also had throat cancer [2], [3], [4]Psychologist Guy (talk) 22:27, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Literally every single sentence in this article is negative. There is ZERO attempt to maintain a neutral point of view, in direct contradiction of wikipedia policy. There isn't even a section for benefits, and when I attempted to add one, you deleted it. Meistro1 (talk) 16:57, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's also factually incorrect to describe it as a high protein diet. It is a high fat diet. A carnivorous diet must be high fat, moderate protein, with zero or virtually zero carbs. Meistro1 (talk) 16:59, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The aim is to represent a neutral point of view from all reliable sources. That is why I suggested you provide reliable sources on the views you feel are missing. Without those, there is not much that can be done. Sklabb (talk) 21:05, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
