Jump to content

Talk:Carnelli

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I object to the deletion of this page. The information contained is correct, pertinent and relevant, if only to a minority. This page is about a game played mostly at Mensa gatherings. I can understand the "under the radar" proposal for deletion, since probably most people have never even heard of it. I will try to improve this situation somehow.

Duartenn 18:10, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I also object to the proposal to delete this entry. It is a game which I've come up online in several contexts, and appears to be spreading from Mensa to Sci-Fi cons and RenFaires, meaning it seems likely to continue to spread, eventually into the mainstream. Wikipedia should be ahead of the curve in documenting its development.

I'm also correcting the text a bit; whenever I've played Carnelli, the rule has been that you *cannot* use actors as a link, it has to be one of the creators of a work. This is one of the features which sets Carnelli apart from other association games. Critterkeeper (talk) 23:06, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Carnelli. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:40, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]