Talk:Carnegie collection

Dinosaurs Low‑importance

	Dinosaurs portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Kosmoceratops

I don't know who keeps reposting "Kosmoceratops" for 2014, but there's no basis for this statement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.76.164.218 (talk) 02:50, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2013 releases for the Carnegie Collection

I keep seeing listings for next year's (2013) Carnegie Collection models as an updated Deinonychus and Einiosaurus,and while I would absolutely love it if it turns out to be true,I've never known Safari Limited to release this kind of information this early or on Wikipedia first. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.251.253.217 (talk) 21:57, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

1988 and missing Dinosaurs

On the original Dinosaurs is marked with the year 1988, not 1989. Are there some mistakes in the timeline, or is the dinosaurs dated before they was released? Also looking at the Safari LTD homepage, it becomes evident that the list isn't complete, as they sell dinosaurs not included on the list. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.213.48.39 (talk) 12:50, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could you list some examples? Sure your not looking at Wild Safari line toys? Also, yes I think the first series was dated 1988 but released the following year. Dinoguy2 (talk) 17:37, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dinoguy2 is right. The original 17 models are dated 1988, but were not released until 1989. This is why the 10th Anniversary Tyrannosaurus was released in 1999 instead of 1998. MvComedy (talk) 16 June 2009 undated—Preceding comment added 19:15, 16 June 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Monterey Bay Sea Life Collection

Shouldn't there also be a page for the Monterey Bay Sea Life Collection. It is also supported by Safari Ltd and is a worthy collection. Just a suggestion.

-Max moa —Preceding unsigned comment added by Max moa (talk • contribs) 16:07, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see no reason there couldn't be. I'm not a collector of that series personally, so I wouldn't be of much help on it. But I'm sure a page could be done if there are enough Monterey Bay collectors on Wikipedia. MvComedy (talk) 26 October 2009 undated

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Carnegie collection. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:36, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why Carnegie Collection has been discontinued?