Talk:Carnegie Museums of Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pennsylvania High‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Museums Mid‑importance

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Mid‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Appalachia Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Appalachia, a collaborative effort to increase coverage of Appalachia and the Appalachian Mountains. If you would like to participate, go to the project page to see a list of related articles needing attention.AppalachiaWikipedia:WikiProject AppalachiaTemplate:WikiProject AppalachiaAppalachia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 January 2021 and 30 April 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mickeyssurfboard. Peer reviewers: PCBWV, Skiv99!.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:49, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment

I feel like this subject is important (high) to Pittsburgh, hence the rating

Neutrality

Much of this article's content is written from the standpoint of public relations for the museum it describes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Georgelazenby (talk • contribs) 20:46, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with this. Terms like "incubator" and "innovative" (applied to the Hillman Photography Initiative section) have migrated from tech/start-up to culture in general as to be meaningless. Generally, they suggest something is hip, cutting edge, and exciting, but these give little sense of the concrete mission or accomplishment of the unit in question. 71.61.59.146 (talk) 15:01, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I also agree. I revised several sentences for neutrality under the Carnegie Science Center section. I also shifted the pronouns to third person so "You are able to tour the submarine to learn how the men lived and worked on the boat" became "The purpose of the exhibit is for visitors to learn how people lived and worked on the boat." --KjessJKT (talk) 18:11, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As part of the Amplifying Appalachia 2023 Edit-a-thon, I've editing several more sentences for neutrality. In particular, I've removed references to the Carnegie Museum of Art's "Collection Search", as I felt it was too self-promotional to direct readers to the museum's website, as well as reduced the number of exhibits listed under the History Museum and Science Center sections to come across less like an advertisement. Since at this point it appears the issue of neutrality has been completely addressed by multiple editors, and since discussion of the neutrality issue has gone dormant, I'm going to remove the maintenance template. Js0257 (talk) 04:51, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Carnegie Museums of Pittsburgh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070530072335/http://www.cmoa.org/searchcollections/ to http://www.cmoa.org/searchcollections/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:07, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Carnegie Museums of Pittsburgh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:03, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article Lead

My edit was rewording this original sentence in the article, "The Carnegie Institute complex that includes the original museum, recital hall, and library was added to the National Register of Historic Places on March 30, 1979." I wrote "The Carnegie Institute complex includes the original museum, recital hall, and library that was added to the National Register of Historic Places on March 30, 1979." I thought by moving the word that, it made the sentence flow better.

A second edit of mine was to remove the unnecessary hyperlinks to some of the words in the article. The pages for them were not developed and were blank and it cleaned up the article to make it look more neater. Edit was made 03/04/2021

Mickeyssurfboard (talk) 19:59, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Mickeysurfboard: Can you reword your heading so that instead of "edits" you describe the section of the article you worked on? Maybe "Article Lead"? KjessJKT (talk) 20:18, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]