Talk:Carlsberg Polska

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Beer Low‑importance

	Beer portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Beer, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Beer, Brewery, and Pub related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BeerWikipedia:WikiProject BeerTemplate:WikiProject BeerBeer articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge

Suggested merge of Okocim Brewery into the appropriate section of Carlsberg Polska - Carlsberg Polska#Okocim Brewery. Okocim no longer exists as a separate company, but has been since 2004 a part of the Carlsberg Group operating under the name Carlsberg Polska, along with three other Polish breweries. The Wikipedia:COMPANY guideline indicates that services and products should be dealt with under the parent company, breaking out in WP:Summary style when a service or product has sufficient material. At present Okocim Brewery is a stub, and to prevent content forking, and to keep the material in context within the parent company, it would be appropriate to allow the information to grow within Carlsberg Polska until it reaches the point where it can be a stand alone article. By bringing stubs together they tend to grow as editors come to the same page from different places. The Okocim Brewery information remains on Wiki, but in a different place - a place where it can grow. This is not a deletion - it is simply a move. Sources, such as RateBeer, have already merged Okocim with Carlsberg Polska.

Jotel feels that Okocim should remain as a stand alone, so the merge is disputed. SilkTork *^{What's YOUR point?} 16:26, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree. Okocim company is notable for its own.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 05:28, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

With no agreement, and two disagreements I've removed the tag. SilkTork *^YES! 11:44, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yet somehow this still got merged. Problem is that with the content merged here there is no "red flag" to expand the proper article on Okocim Brewery, for example on its history and tradition, which have essentially nothing to do with Carlsberg. Volunteer Marek 22:11, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Carlsberg Polska. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:32, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]