Talk:Carlos Landín Martínez/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Willbb234 (talk · contribs) 05:46, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Comment: I have already read and copyedited this article. Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 05:46, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Copyedited roughly ten days ago. All good.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

   Plenty of WP:RS to back up information.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Covers the topic well and explains the key areas in detail

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Written neutrally

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Stable

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   A single, non-free image but with fair use rationales. Used appropriately

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Very well written article. More images would have been good, but due to the subject of the article, good images are hard to come by.