Talk:Caribou Coffee

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Food and drink: Foodservice Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related taskforces:
/
	This article is supported by the Foodservice task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Minnesota Low‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I added more information about Arcapita (based in Bahrain) and the nature of Caribou's Sharia obligations. I intended to be fair, "just the facts".

I added Arcapita's own website displaying other investments of the company including The Tensar Corporation, Cypress Communications, Southland log Homes, Church's Chicken, Loehmann's, Cirrus Design Corporation, and many others.

Stub

I don't think that this article should be a stub, but I don't know how to change it into a normal article.--Daffy100 23:27, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to work on this article and get it out of stub.--phenz^Talk 04:45, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Advertizement

What is your message in your ad, the women and two Caribou. What message are you sending, that will catch the attention of potential customers.

Thanks Steve131.187.253.130 13:23, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted a biased paragraph that was bitching about prices/treatment of employees. Wikipedia is not the place to vent about such matters. Kirkesque 01:49, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Caribou.gif

Image:Caribou.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:54, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FOOD Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Restaurants or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. You can find the related request for tagging here -- TinucherianBot (talk) 08:10, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy section

I just removed this because it was unsourced and did not make clear what Caribou Coffee had done that was actually controversial or who found it so. If there are sources showing notable commentators believe there is something sinister about Caribou Coffee's ownership - or that the actions of owners have drawn significant controversy to the company then we should reinstate it - rewritten and properly verified. I also think - given the lack of other sources the snopes link from the external links section should probably go. Without other coverage it doesn't that seem justified. -- SiobhanHansa 18:17, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ownership

Why are we mentioning a particular line of the "philosophy" of the majority stake holders? In what way does its inclusion conform to Wikipedia's due weight requirement for a neutral point of view? Are there significant actions the comapny has taken because of this philosophy? Is the issue considered significant in the business community? We need reliable sources that show this significance before writing about it like this. The philosophies of most major investors are not selectively quoted in most business articles here. -- SiobhanHansa 18:24, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The snopes article is outdated (links on it lead to dead-end pages) and the focus on the ownership is probably perpetuated by someone with interest in Starbucks. Seriously. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.162.103.132 (talk) 22:21, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why is Caribou's new parent company on the list for businesses that used forced labor during WWII? If you google "Joh. A. Benckiser GmbH Forced Labor" and you get this....http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Holocaust/germanco1.html. they wont answer the question. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.192.99.54 (talk) 23:30, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Headquarters

Why is the Headquarters listed as Minneapolis, Minnesota? It really is in Brooklyn Center, Minnesota. and I would know because I actually live there. Alec92 (talk) 02:58, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Partnership with Coca-cola

Someone should add a section about Caribou's partnership with Coca-cola in distributed canned iced coffee drinks. I would, but I'm no good at writing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.85.193.111 (talk) 17:56, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It'd also be nice to add something about Caribou's recent partnership with Project 7, selling items such as gum, mints and water with over half the proceeds going to charities. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kiwisoup (talk • contribs) 07:41, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Marketing Language

Someone's been adding content to this page using marketing language. The term "handcrafted oatmeal" stuck out as marketing speak. I'm not sure if this type of language is descriptive and encyclopedic, or simply marketing buzzwords, else I'd be bold. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pyrogen (talk • contribs) 05:09, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Since I last visited this page, the article took a sharp turn toward sounding like an advertisement and some of the criticisms about investors and rainforest alliance were removed. Kiwisoup (talk) 05:25, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Locations inconsistent and incorrect

The introduction states that there are "415 company-owned coffeehouses in 40 states and the District of Columbia, as well as 126 franchise locations worldwide" and then later states in the History section that there are "415 locations in 16 states and the District of Columbia." Which is it, 40 states or 16 states? The answer is neither. I counted them myself and they are in 19 states and the District of Columbia.

Also, the article states that stores outside of Colorado, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, North Carolina, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wisconsin would close 9 days after April 5, 2013 (which would be April 14, 2013 as the date of closings). Their Atlanta, GA location is still open as of November 22, 2013. (75.65.220.204 (talk))

Proposed Changes for the page

A group of us were looking to make some changes to page. We were hoping to just to update the page with information about how the beans are rainforest alliance, talk about Amy's Blend and how the company is involved with fighting breast cancer. We also wanted to update the information about who currently owns the company and the recent store closings.We were also hoping to update the lead. Also think that the structure of the article needs to be redone. More sections need to be added for this additional information. I would love some feedback! (Gjohnson33 (talk) 16:55, 9 July 2015 (UTC))Moved from the top of the page to the bottom Cheers, Lindsay^Hello 08:31, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback! Sure, let's make some changes and make the article better. I will caution, however, on a couple of points. First, don't go in all guns blazing, make radical changes, and maintain them. this essay has some excellent suggestions about the process to use ~ effectively, it is make a change, if someone disputes it or reverts it, then discuss it here ~ and many or most editors expect the process to be used. Second, i notice you say "[w]e" and "[a] group of us"; that sounds as though it could be one or more people with a conflict of interest (we say COI for short ~ we love abbreviations!), i.e., someone with a financial or other interest in the success or otherwise of Caribou Coffee. If that is the case (and i quite recognise it may not be), i suggest you adhere to the recommendations/requirements you can find at COI ~ effectively, they are that you make suggestions on the talk page (here) and let other editors make the actual changes as they see fit. This page is now on my watchlist, so i'll see if you make changes here, and i'll drop by to have a look and see if i can help. Cheers, Lindsay^Hello 08:55, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, one more thing that i meant to add. Your use of the plural (we and us) ~ please be aware that an account with Wikipedia is only for the use of one person; if there are several of you, you each need your own accounts to edit with. WP:ACCOUNT has some links and information about accounts. Cheers, Lindsay^Hello 09:01, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't support these proposed changes. BlueSalix (talk) 03:55, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Caribou Coffee. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:31, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]