Talk:Cara Cunningham/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: (CK)Lakeshade (talk · contribs · count) - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 23:59, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Im sorry but i will be failing this article:

• Trivial section is WP:OR and not allowed anyways.
• Selected videography is trivial and fails WP:GAC 3b.
• Entire article contains WP:OR and references that fail WP:RS such as: Myspace and Youtube, which the majority of the article uses. Articles must contain 3rd party reliable coverage.
• We have WP:NOTABILITY and WP:UNDUE issues in abundance in this article.
• WP:MOS violations such unformatted references.

Stage by stage

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: