Jump to content

Talk:Captivating

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notability

[edit]

I almost proposed this article for deletion then found a number of Google News hits. --A. B. (talkcontribs) 15:21, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Inbalanced

[edit]

I think it's a bit unfair that nearly every external link listed leads to a negative review of this book. Why not include links to webpages that endorse it? After all, this website is supposed to be objective and unbiased, right? Present both sides of the story. --76.6.152.23 (talk) 21:32, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't seen a positive review. Feel free to add one. Staecker (talk) 21:55, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree this article seems very unbalanced. The book was considered a best seller. It must have some positive merit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.138.177.2 (talk) 05:05, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Captivating. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:34, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]