Talk:Captain Munnerlyn/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: maclean (talk) 20:36, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
- GA review (see Wikipedia:What is a good article?)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- It is stable.
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- No images used.
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Notes
- Munnerlyn's stats need to be updated.
- Add |publisher= field to citation 6.
- Both done.--Giants27(Contribs|WP:CFL) 21:34, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
- Also, please update the "Carolina Panthers" sub-section, specifically the "he planned on playing in the game..." bit. Did he play, were there consequences? This may help
- Done.--Giants27(Contribs|WP:CFL) 21:49, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
- Munnerlyn did play a week later without recording a defensive stat.[14] I thought this said he didn't play (G = 0). He is not listed in the game log. --maclean (talk) 04:25, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
- You're correct, I'll correct my error tonight. Cheers,--Giants27(Contribs|WP:CFL) 19:30, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
- Munnerlyn did play a week later without recording a defensive stat.[14] I thought this said he didn't play (G = 0). He is not listed in the game log. --maclean (talk) 04:25, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
- Done.--Giants27(Contribs|WP:CFL) 21:49, 11 January 2010 (UTC)