Talk:Captain Future (magazine)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: J Milburn (talk · contribs) 19:01, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to offer some thoughts.

What precisely is a superscientist? Is it a very good scientist or a superhero who is also a scientist? (It's not in the OED.) I note that in the main prose, it is "super-scientist".
I think the intended meaning is a very good scientist, though the source doesn't explain and I haven't read the relevant stories. I added the hyphen in the lead; does that suffice? Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 23:10, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Technically, citations are needed for all quotes, even in the lead.
Done. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 23:10, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"the disembodied brain of Simon Wright" Presumably, you don't mean disembodied- the brain would still be corporeal- detached, perhaps?
You're right, of course, but "disembodied" is what the source says. I assume they mean a brain in a vat, though perhaps not quite in the usual philosophical sense. A quick bit of Googling finds this, which makes it definite. I've just made it "brain", which sidesteps the issue; is there a better way to say it? Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 23:10, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Is Startling Comics worth linking? How about Better Publications?
I can't find a good target for the comic, which surprises me. I linked Better Publications to Standard Magazines, which was the parent corporation. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 23:10, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Your Superman link goes to an article on the character, not a particular publication
That's the best link I could find. Apparently Weisinger didn't leave to edit a particular comic; he left to edit the group of Superman comics, and I don't think there's a suitable link for that. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 23:10, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I notice from the covers that the tagline changed- is this mentioned in any of your sources?
No, but I just searched and found something that will work. Probably have to be tomorrow to make the edit; I'm out of time for tonight. Thanks for the review, as usual! Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 23:10, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
OK, done. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 03:36, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As ever, looks strong. Please check my changes- I've adjusted the table and added an image, among smaller tweaks. J Milburn (talk) 19:01, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My only concern with the changes is the use of the volume/issue number to refer to the magazine's individual issues, both in the image caption and the table. It's not that it's wrong, it's just that it's never done that way -- nobody knows the volume/issue numbers for most magazines; it's just bibliographic data you look up when you need it. Everyone uses the cover date to identify the magazines. Is there a way to make the table correctly sortable while using the magazine dates as the visible text? Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 03:50, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Understood- I've adjusted this. J Milburn (talk) 17:14, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

According to page 55 of this book, Captain Future was "the first science fiction pulp built around the exploits of a single character". J Milburn (talk) 19:13, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's not just the first one, it's really the only one. I added a footnote to say so; does that cover it? Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 23:10, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]