Talk:Captain (naval)

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military culture, traditions, and heraldry task force
	Maritime warfare task force

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Communist state#Former communist states|former communist states]] The anchor (#Former communist states) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Merger Proposal

i porpose that Captain (United States O-6) be merged into Captain (naval). Why have two articles onthe same subject?--Petebutt (talk) 07:19, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Are you also going to propose that we merge Captain (Royal Navy), Kapitän zur See, and Ship-of-the-line captain to this article? - BilCat (talk) 07:54, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - For exactly the same reason as BilCat. (Plus all the other articles BilCat didn't mention.) Pdfpdf (talk) 13:22, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - Captain (naval) covers captains in a general global sense, Captain (United States O-6) covers the peculiarities of the rank in the USA, they are not the same thing. Op47 (talk) 18:11, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A proposition

How about writing something about naval captains who are not corresponding to land colonels (for example in Poland)? I'm not sure, so I won't write this, but maybe it should be here. 93.105.56.218 (talk) 12:55, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Finland

Actually, Finland has somewhat similar system than Poland. Why it is not mentioned? Equivalent rank is commodore (kommodori) and there is captain lieutenant (kapteeniluutnantti) which equals captain of land forces. 85.217.38.12 (talk) 00:01, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Vietnam People's Navy Senior Commander.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:08, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do we need multiple articles for every equivalent rank, like Kapitan zur See...

The German rank Kapitän zur See, the rank equivalent to Naval Captain, redirects to its literal translation, Captain at sea#Germany. Why shouldn't it redirect here? Is there some duty a German Captain fulfills that justifies a separate article?

Captain of sea and war seems to be a literal translation of the equivalent rank's Portugese name. As above, why does it require a separate article.

And Ship-of-the-line captain, what's up with that? "Ship of the line" is a term that dates back to the fleet actions of sailing ships.

This article needs more references. But those other articles are completely unreferenced. This introduces the concern those articles contain the personal opinions of the wikipedia contributors who wrote them, not WP:reliable sources, as policy requires. Geo Swan (talk) 22:39, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Given no objections, for the 3 merge proposal,

Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 15:25, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]