Talk:Capital punishment in Pakistan
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I was surprised there is no mention of what crimes make one eligible for the death penalty. 66.41.179.140 (talk) 01:37, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Capital punishment in Pakistan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060615043654/http://amnesty.org.uk:80/news_details.asp?NewsID=16975 to http://www.amnesty.org.uk/news_details.asp?NewsID=16975
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071113155527/http://web.amnesty.org:80/library/index/engACT530032000?open&of=THEMES/DEATH+PENALTY to http://web.amnesty.org/library/index/engACT530032000?open&of=THEMES/DEATH+PENALTY
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120227043847/http://www.mpil.de:80/shared/data/pdf/pakistan_code_of_criminal_procedure.pdf to http://www.mpil.de/shared/data/pdf/pakistan_code_of_criminal_procedure.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160421162431/http://web.amnesty.org/pages/deathpenalty-facts-eng to http://web.amnesty.org/pages/deathpenalty-facts-eng
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121202101146/http://www.hrcp-web.org/showprel.asp?id=173 to http://www.hrcp-web.org/showprel.asp?id=173
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
- https://web.archive.org/web/20060615043654/http://amnesty.org.uk:80/news_details.asp?NewsID=16975
- https://web.archive.org/web/20071113155527/http://web.amnesty.org:80/library/index/engACT530032000?open&of=THEMES/DEATH+PENALTY
- https://web.archive.org/web/20120227043847/http://www.mpil.de:80/shared/data/pdf/pakistan_code_of_criminal_procedure.pdf
- https://web.archive.org/web/20121202101146/http://www.hrcp-web.org/showprel.asp?id=173
An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked=
to true
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
- https://web.archive.org/web/20160421162431/http://web.amnesty.org/pages/deathpenalty-facts-eng
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:43, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Islamic views on capital punishment section
[edit]This is just... such an oddly written section. It seems like a opinionated analysis with a third-person writing perspective than it does an encyclopedia entry.
SunnySydeRamsay (talk) 19:47, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
I agree. I think this section should be removed. Islamic views on the death penalty vary far to much to be contained within this one small section-- at very minimum its far too ambitious. I will echo that I think this is opinionated as it basically seems to be strawmanning Islam with the title of the section. Something more specific to Pakistan's legal system as is detailed in the Crimes Punishable by Death section would be more appropriate. --Ex humanities major (talk) 06:14, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- I'll say a couple of things about this section -- First, the section, and this article in general, does very little to reference additional wikipedia articles that denote the importance of specific Islamic legal schools, and adjudication of law. I think this section should reference more releveant, contemporary figures within Islamic legal theory around the Pakistani state, and the specific schools of thought they follow if it is to stay. The Hadith referenced seems to be a fragmented quote, as it chops off the first part of the Isnad, and the section does nothing to carry out how this Hadith has been interpreted w/r/t capital punishment. Additionally, Hadith (as far as I know) is generally considered to be a somewhat unreliable, and information that is to be taken with a grain of salt. This is the purpose of the Isnad chain. 129.59.122.76 (talk) 17:31, 29 March 2023 (UTC)