Talk:Cape St. Vincent

Portugal High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Portugal To-do:

Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.

Improve key articles to Good article

Improve

Review

Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).

Requests

See Requested articles

Assess

Help assessing articles.

Need images

Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia

Wikify

Vote:

Watch this list — Edit this list

It seems to me that there are some severe errors in this article at the moment. First, the picture doesn't show the Cape Saint Vincent, but the Ponta del Sangres close by, and secondly the license of the picture is reported to be wrong.
Also the article begins with telling that Cape Saint Vincent also is called Cape del Sangres. The truth seems to be that they are different points on the Faros peninsula: MSN-map of the place As the geographical data are mixed up, the information about the history of the place may also be unreliable, concerning exactly which site they refere to. I don't have the knowledge or access to proper sources myself to correct these things, but somebody perhaps have visited the place? Islander(Scandinavia) 13:41, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Now it all seem to be in order, thanks to JoJan, since beginning of december. -Islander(Scandinavia) 09:46, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Correction needed The article states that in 1641 the naval battle between the Dutch and Spanish was won by the Spanish. The corresponding Wikipedia article however states that the Dutch lost 2 ships and 100 men, but the Spanish lost 2 ships and 1000 men, retreated to Cadiz and leaving the cape to the Dutch.

Herman-I (talk) 09:11, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since nobody responded to my plead above, today I corrected the article.

Herman-I (talk) 21:51, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cape St. Vincent. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160818075259/http://www.monumentos.pt/Site/APP_PagesUser/SIPA.aspx?id=16894 to http://www.monumentos.pt/Site/APP_PagesUser/SIPA.aspx?id=16894

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:39, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]