Talk:Canterbury, Connecticut

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Connecticut Start‑class High‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sources?

I'm having trouble finding references re: the "facts" presented in the Government section. Does the original poster have some sources to cite, please? Szarka 17:21, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Government section continues to be a place where folks add their opinions. I've removed several more such sentences. Given how controversial this topic is, I suggest that those who want to contribute to this section present specific facts (e.g. number of supporters of a particular party) rather than subjective observations (e.g. "unable to fill a closet with supporters"), referencing appropriate sources. Szarka 01:52, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Canterbury First

Is Canterbury First a "political party", as currently described in the Government section? The PDF at http://www.sots.ct.gov/ElectionsServices/lists/2005OctRegEnrollStats.pdf doesn't list any minor party voters for Canterbury. Perhaps Canterbury First is some other kind of caucus? Szarka 01:57, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yesterday's paper answered my question: Canterbury First just received party status. I've updated the article and cited the Norwich Bulletin appropriately. Szarka 17:56, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notable people section

I was trying to find a reference to cite showing Margaret Wise Brown's relationship to Canterbury. Please add this information if you have it available. Thank you--BuzyBody (talk) 17:18, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Canterbury, Connecticut. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:01, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Canterbury, Connecticut. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://factfinder2.census.gov/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061212013827/http://www.canterburypublicschools.org/ces.htm to http://www.canterburypublicschools.org/ces.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061207051029/http://www.canterburypublicschools.org/dhbms.htm to http://www.canterburypublicschools.org/dhbms.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.tourism.state.ct.us/tourism_regions/default.asp?region=mysticcountry

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:50, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]