Talk:Cango Caves

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cango Caves article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Caves

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caves, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of caving and cave articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CavesWikipedia:WikiProject CavesTemplate:WikiProject CavesCaves articles

South Africa High‑importance

	South Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Correct info on discovery

Hi there,

I work for the Cango caves and have notived that the actual discovery of the cave and the forming thereof is pretty incorrect. Please advise as how I can go about giving the correct info.

Docmouton (talk) 09:10, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Docmouton! You're always free to edit the article yourself, so if you think something is wrong, you can simply change it to the correct information.

However, I should warn you that Wikipedians care a lot about verifiability, and in this case it looks like this article currently cites some sources (a journal article and several books), that are supposed to back up the current information. Before changing it, you should look up those sources and see if they really contain information you believe is incorrect. (It's also possible they're being misinterpreted, or that this article simply disagrees with them. The only way to find out is to look them up.) If you still think this article is wrong, you should find some reliable sources giving the correct info, and then cite those sources in this article.

Let me know if you need help doing any of this, and good luck! —Keenan Pepper 17:07, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]