Talk:Candidates of the 1901 Australian federal election

	Australia portal Candidates of the 1901 Australian federal election is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Miscellaneous notes

Thanks User:Frickeg for pointing me to the Hawker reference. Hawker calls Leo Cussen an independent protectionist, agreeing with this report from the Portland Guardian: "If elected he would give his support to Mr Barton, although he was opposed to his views in some instances, still he thought Mr Barton should be given a fair chance."

I previously edited George Simpson in New England from Ind FT to just Ind. Hawker disagrees with me, writing that the "'second' freetrader, GM Simpson, played a lone hand against the former freetrade MP Edmund Lonsdale...". I still like my edit, based on this SMH report: "The candidate announced that he would give, if elected, the Barton Government a fair trial.... He was not a party man in any sense, believing that good could be derived from the fiscal policies of both Mr. Barton and Mr. Reid."

Otherwise I don't think I'll make any further edits. There are some cases where the official endorsements or otherwise are unclear to me (in particular, I wonder if some of the, e.g., "Ind Prot" v "Prot" distinctions were decided by Hughes and Graham based on who got the most votes -- which of course will be correct much of the time), but I haven't found sources that clearly contradict what's in the table as it is now. Pappubahry (talk) 07:47, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]