Talk:Canal Defence Light

Military history: Land vehicles / Technology / Weaponry / British / European / World War II C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military land vehicles task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War II task force

Untitled

The 'Canal Defence Light' cover name was intended to suggest that the device was to be used along and around the Suez Canal area. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.7.147.13 (talk) 11:17, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Do you have a reference (book, website, journal) for that? Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:59, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid not, I just remember reading about it many years ago. Can't remember the book, although it would have been a reputable one. I just put the comment above because I thought someone might wonder why it was called that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.7.147.13 (talk) 13:51, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dazzler_(weapon)#Origins

"Whirling Spray was a system of search lights fitted with rotating mirrors which was used to dazzle and confuse pilots attacking the Suez canal. This was developed into the Canal Defence Light ..."

Refers to a TV Programme ! "Real Lives: Magic at War". Channel 4.

--195.137.93.171 (talk) 20:34, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.7.147.13 (talk) 14:32, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]