Talk:Canada's Top 100 Employers

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

Untitled

Hi Emarsee, could you provide a bit more detail on the tag you've added to this page? This is a large editorially-based competition that thousands of HR people across Canada work on each year. Can you let us know if there's a section that you feel lacks a neutral POV? Without more detail, it's difficult for editors to know where to fix the concerns that you have raised. Devenish1850 (talk) 18:16, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See comments on your talk page. єmarsee • Speak up! 01:39, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Proposal

The pages that I think should be merged would belong better as sub sections of this page. There is no reason why they should be separate pages.

Blatant promotion of non-notable conference and employer "lists"

I removed more promotional material and name dropping that were either unsourced or sourced to the company's website. These websites are nothing but advertising spam. Flowanda | Talk 08:20, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was pages merged D O N D E groovily Talk to me 15:32, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As mentioned above, there is an ongoing proposal that BC's Top Employers, Manitoba's Top Employers, Saskatchewan's Top Employers, Greater Toronto's Top Employers, and Waterloo Area's Top Employers be merged into this article. I am prepared to perform the merge if we can get consensus on this. These articles are all connected in that "The winners are chosen by the editors of Canada's Top 100 Employers". I would like to see this resolved one way or the other soon. Because there were no comments on the previous merge discussion, I will request input on the WikiProject Canada talk page. Quasi human | Talk 16:20, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support. There's a lot of overlap, and they are interrelated. No need for separate articles from what I can see. PK T(alk) 17:05, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support as all of these come from the same source and are basically the same thing, it just depends which boxes yuo tick on your application form. The separate articles look to me like a thinly-veiled attempt to promote this commercial venture. Franamax (talk) 01:32, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support for the reasons already stated. When merging, please ensure to retain information about the media affiliations for each region. Mind matrix 21:22, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support per above. It's long overdue. █ EMARSEE 03:19, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.