Talk:Camrose, Alberta

This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Canada: Alberta / Communities / The 10,000 Challenge Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Alberta.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian communities.
	This article was created or improved during The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada, which started in November 2016 and is ongoing. You can help!!

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Alberta which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 00:36, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Change proposal: Fix the rather suspicious description of the college

I don't like the way part of section 7.2 is worded, specifically the part that begins with "as a Faculty of the University of Alberta...", ends with Template:Citation Needed, and sounds like it came straight out of a brochure (no seriously, I can practically hear "Stellaris MegaCorp OST - The March of Profits" while reading it). I think, in order to stay in line with Wikipedia's purpose (and avoid meeting WP:G11 in that section), we should either either resolve the Citation needed to determine if it came from an advertisement, figure out a way to reword it in an unbiased way, or both.

I saw another page (one about a supposedly "academic" society I'm part of, so I'd be lying if I said I wasn't slightly disappointed with my peers...) get deleted and locked for similar G11 concerns, so while this is only a part of the page and probably not as severe, I'm nonetheless a little concerned. We can do better than this!--Macks2008 (talk) 20:12, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]