Talk:Camping (Parks and Recreation)

Camping (Parks and Recreation) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Camping (Parks and Recreation) is part of the Parks and Recreation (season 3) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 5, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed
July 21, 2011	Good topic candidate	Promoted

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 6, 2011.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that in the Parks and Recreation episode "Camping", protagonist Leslie Knope (Amy Poehler) revealed she once dreamed of being happily married to the fictional alien ALF?

Current status: Good article

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Camping (Parks and Recreation)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk) 21:28, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Adding a quick note to say that I will review. I'll give the article a read through now and add any points that come up below. Miyagawa (talk) 21:28, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cultural references: Can you have a look to see if you merge a couple of sentences into one another, as at the moment it feels like its a list with the line breaks removed. The actual content itself is good, just the flow needs to be looked at.
- Yeah, this is always a challenge, given the nature of these sections. I tried to rework it a bit, placed everything in order so that the related bits are together (mostly Tom/tent stuff in the first paragraph, Leslie stuff in the second) to make this flow better. Let me know if it needs more work. — Hun ter Ka hn 03:06, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ratings: Would it be possible to change defeated in the final sentence, perhaps to "beat" or similar - its just that defeated is quite a prominent word in the previous sentence.
- Done. — Hun ter Ka hn 03:06, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Images: Is it possible to add a low quality screencap from the episode to the infobox with a fair use rationale?
- I had an image, but it's now up for deletion, so I just nominated the episode without a photo. Perhaps there is a better image that can be used with a fair use rationale. (I thought about maybe the inside of the tent, to actually show all Tom's luxury items, maybe.) Maybe you can help me identify one: after reading the article, is there anything in particular you feel could be illustrated to help further the readers' understanding of the episode? — Hun ter Ka hn 03:06, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good job so far, apart from those few issues everything checks out. I'll place the article on hold for the moment. Miyagawa (talk) 22:02, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review! — Hun ter Ka hn 03:06, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

I understand completely about the image, it's only a nice to have because there are no free use images available. Happy to grade this as a GA following those improvements. Good job. Miyagawa (talk) 20:39, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]