Talk:Campbell Case
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Taking a crack at a rewrite
[edit]I'm going to take a pop at getting this from stub form into something passable. Feel free to chime in with concerns, obviously.
— Tim Davenport, Early American Marxism website, Corvallis, OR (USA) Carrite (talk) 16:29, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi comrades (as I can assume most editors here are), To bring this to Good Article status:
- Prelude needs notice of
- The election of the Labour government
- Its minority status, and the weakness of a minority government in Westminster
- The status of the CPGB, the main line in the party, if Cambpell held the main line or a minority (ultraleftist) position
- Relationship to the Great Strike / structure of rank-and-file / spontaneous left-working class dissent
- Reaction in conservative / liberal / labour press
- Calls for prosecution
- Any charges
- Any proceedings held
- Context and importance of no-confidence in Westminster
- Aftermath makes clear that the issue of Ultraleftism (in its Leninist parlance) is at stake. Why no introduction of what ultraleftism in the British context (cough, Pankhurst, cough) is?
- Needs far more citations from a larger variety of sources. Maybe "British politics between the wars" type texts?
- Needs Communist Internationale context
- Needs context and importance of Zinoviev letter
- Language is decently npov
- Quotes are overspaced?
- Picture lacks alt tag? Picture of a CPGB rally from period? Picture of the Labour PM?
I was asked to do a "drive-by" review by a fellow-worker.Fifelfoo (talk) 14:19, 28 September 2009 (UTC)