Talk:Camp Kabeyun

This article was nominated for deletion on 26 July 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	New Hampshire portal This article is supported by WikiProject New Hampshire (assessed as Low-importance).

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... it explains what Kabeyun is, and is written in the exactly same style as for other summer camps. If there are specific sections that are overly promotional, please note them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Signalridge (talk • contribs) 20:50, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That is the problem. Many of them look like promotion.Dlohcierekim (talk) 21:00, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

None of these other camp pages has been nominated for deletion. In what ways is the Kabeyun page different from theirs? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Signalridge (talk • contribs) 21:22, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How can institutions with nearly century-long histories represent themselves without this problem? Do you have any specific suggestions? Are there potential criticisms or counterarguments that would assuage your concerns? I must confess that I regard this blanket attack on the genre as massively underspecified.

Promotional language has nothing to do with the age of the institution. Dlohcierekim (talk) 21:15, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I completely disagree. A century's history is worth recording. Nevertheless, are there ways that that history can be recorded and memorialized here in ways that do you not hit your "promotional" hackles? Again, I am looking for an answer that is specific and constructive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Signalridge (talk • contribs) 21:20, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Dlohcierekim, do you have objections to the History section in the prior version, or only to the section on program? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Signalridge (talk • contribs) 01:54, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL